Best Shipthis Alternatives in 2026 (Top 10 Compared)

Comparing the top 10 best Shipthis alternatives includes 1. CargoEZ, 2. Shipthis, 3. GoFreight, 4. Magaya, 5. Logistaas, 6. Logitude World, 7. Fresa XPress, 8. CargoWise, 9. GoComet, and 10. Descartes.

This is a comparison of freight forwarding software platforms, not of freight forwarding companies. Every product below is a system you license and run your own shipments through. None of them move your cargo.

Shipthis is one of the few vendors in this category that publishes a per-seat price, which makes it a common starting point for small and midsize forwarders shopping for their first real operating system. It also makes it a common benchmark: once a forwarder knows what $89 per user per month buys, every other quote gets measured against it.

The forwarders who go looking for a Shipthis alternative usually have one of four reasons. They need US customs filing that is named in the product, not implied. They want the accounting module to be the book of record instead of a bridge to QuickBooks. They want to know the full annual cost before signing, including anything billed per transaction. Or they simply need a different module mix, because warehouse and inventory depth, or customs clearance automation, sits outside what Shipthis reviewers say the product does today.

Shipthis Alternatives at a Glance

One pricing note that matters before you build a budget. Capterra, GetApp and Software Advice list Shipthis as "$89 flat rate," while the vendor's own pricing page states $89 per user per month. Those are very different numbers at five seats. Take the vendor page as authoritative and confirm it in writing.

Capability Matrix

My Picks: Best Shipthis Alternatives

• CargoEZ is best for US small and midsize air and ocean forwarders that want CRM, rates, operations, the ledger and customs writing to a single shipment record.

• Shipthis is best for forwarders and NVOCCs that want a published per-seat price and a real 30 day trial before committing.

• GoFreight is best for forwarders that want a modern operations suite backed by a large and current G2 review base.

• Magaya is best for operations that combine forwarding, customs brokerage and warehousing in one company.

• Logistaas is best for forwarders that want a flat per-seat cost with no transaction or per-shipment fees at all.

• Logitude World is best for teams that rank vendor responsiveness at the top of the scorecard.

• Fresa XPress is best for cost-sensitive forwarders who need the lowest documented entry price in this comparison.

• CargoWise is best for large multinational forwarders that can resource a demanding implementation and want depth above all else.

• GoComet is best for adding visibility, rate benchmarking and freight audit next to an operating system you are keeping.

• Descartes is best for adding real-time shipment visibility to an existing stack.

How I Evaluated These 10 Platforms

I ran every platform through the same six questions. Call it the Six-Gate Shipthis Replacement Test. A platform does not need to pass all six, but you need to know which ones it fails before you sign, not after.

Gate 1: Operational depth and workflow fit. Does one shipment file carry the job from quote to invoice, and how many modules does an operator touch to get there? This is where Shipthis reviewers flag the absence of warehouse and inventory management and of customs clearance automation, and where GoComet and Descartes drop out of contention entirely, because neither is a forwarding suite.

Gate 2: Visibility and tracking. Can you and your customer see where the freight is without a phone call, and is that capability included or metered? Shipthis bills Track and Trace as a transactional add-on. GoComet's entire product is this gate, done well, with ocean coverage its reviewers rate above its road coverage.

Gate 3: Financial and rate management. Is there a real ledger, does it post from the job, and do the reports hold up at month end? This is the single most criticized area across the whole category. GoFreight reviewer frank f. asks for "more account function" precisely because he does "not need another accounting software running." Logitude reviewers report "Multiple Accounting reports are missing." Fresa XPress reviewer Sameer S., a finance manager, cites "Limited flexibility for editing posted transactions."

Gate 4: Integration and scalability. Can the system take your data in, give it back, and hold up as volume grows? GoFreight reviewer TONY C. names dataset import and export as a pain point. Fresa XPress reviewer Siva S. notes the "System may become slow when handling large volumes of data, especially in reports." Logitude reviewers say the "API are bit expensive if you want to integrate with other software internally."

Gate 5: Pricing transparency and hidden fees. Can you model a full year before you sign? Only four platforms here publish a number at all: Shipthis at $89 per user per month, Logitude World at $75 and $99 per user per month, Logistaas at $45, $65 and $85 per user per month, and Fresa XPress at $40 per user per month. Everyone else, CargoEZ included, quotes privately. Separately, CargoWise changed its model on 1 December 2025 and now charges a transaction fee per logistics job with no public dollar figures.

Gate 6: Implementation and support. How long until you are live, who does the work, and what does it cost? CargoEZ averages under one month on G2. GoFreight claims 4 to 8 weeks, which is the vendor's figure and not an independently verified one. Magaya scores 8.2 out of 10 on G2 ease of setup, though reviewer George G. warns that "implementation is a very lengthy process with multiple charges and fees." CargoWise scores 6.4 out of 10 on the same G2 measure, the lowest in this set, and delivers through a certified Service Partner model.

A note on how I read ratings. I weight sample size and recency, not just the number. The GoFreight Capterra pool is dated 2019 to 2020 and should not be read as current sentiment. The CargoWise Capterra pool contains no reviews after May 2022. Both are still useful history. Neither tells you what the product is like in 2026.

Detailed Comparison

1. CargoEZ

Best for

US small and midsize air and ocean freight forwarders that want CRM, rate desk, operations, accounting and customs on one login and one shipment record.

CargoEZ is built around one idea, which is that a shipment should live in a single record rather than being passed between modules. The specifics:

• Nine modules on one login. Contacts, Leads, Rates, Freight, Finance, Warehouse, Chat, Customs and Admin.

• One shipment record. CRM, rate desk, operations, the ledger and customs all write to the same file, so a quote becomes a booking without a re-key.

• Costs post where they accrue. The costs on the job are the costs the ledger posts, and the customs filing references the file the operator already has open.

• A native double-entry ledger. Finance is the book of record, not a bridge to an accounting package, so there are no two sources of truth to reconcile.

• US customs in the platform. The Customs module covers AMS and ISF and is currently in beta.

• Deliberately narrow. Built for US air and ocean forwarders, not NVOCCs, enterprise global forwarders, trucking-only operations, parcel or warehousing-first businesses.

• V2.0 work. Road and door-to-door movements, spot-rate procurement and direct ACE portal connectivity.

• Implementation. Under one month on average per G2, the fastest documented figure in this comparison.

• Security. SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, TLS 1.2+ in transit and AES-256 at rest.

That architecture targets the problem that dominates the review evidence in this category, which is not missing features but data a person has to move between modules or between systems.

Pros

• CRM, rates, operations, ledger and customs write to one shipment record, so there is no module-to-module re-keying

• Native double-entry ledger rather than an accounting integration, which removes the sync-failure class of problem

• AMS and ISF filing inside the platform, addressing the gap Shipthis reviewers name explicitly

• Under one month average implementation on G2, the fastest documented in this set

• 4.8 / 5 on G2 across 40 reviews

• SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, TLS 1.2+ and AES-256

Cons

• No public pricing, so you cannot model a year without talking to sales

• Customs module is in beta, and direct ACE portal connectivity is V2.0 work, not shipping today

• Road and door-to-door movements are V2.0, so multimodal forwarders that quote door-to-door will want a different fit today

• Spot-rate procurement is V2.0, so buying-side rate sourcing is not automated yet

• Deliberately not for NVOCCs, enterprise global forwarders, trucking-only, parcel or warehousing-first operations

• 40 reviews is a smaller pool than Magaya, GoComet or Descartes carry

• Free trial not documented

CargoEZ review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

CargoEZ is an AI-native freight forwarding platform built for US small and midsize air and ocean forwarders. Nine modules run on one login, and the point of the design is that they all write to a single shipment record rather than passing data between each other.

Tool Features

Contacts and Leads for CRM. Rates for the rate desk. Freight for operations. Finance, a native double-entry ledger. Warehouse. Chat. Customs, in beta, covering AMS and ISF. Admin for user and permission control. Security covers SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, TLS 1.2+ and AES-256.

What It Costs

Custom quote. No public price is published. Ask for a 10-seat annual figure with implementation included, and ask whether anything is billed per transaction.

Best fit for

US small and midsize air and ocean freight forwarders that are tired of running a CRM, an operations system and an accounting package as three separate products, and that file AMS and ISF.

Not built for

NVOCCs, enterprise global forwarders, trucking-only operations, parcel, and warehousing-first businesses. Forwarders whose core business is road or door-to-door movements will want a different fit until V2.0.

What users are saying

CargoEZ holds 4.8 out of 5 on G2 across 40 reviews, tied for the highest score in this comparison among the full forwarding suites, alongside Shipthis on Capterra, GoFreight on G2 and Fresa XPress on Capterra. The caveat matters as much as the number: 40 reviews is a real sample but a modest one, roughly a seventh of Magaya's pool, so treat it as a strong early signal rather than a settled verdict. G2 also records implementation averaging under one month.

Our Verdict

Choose CargoEZ if you are a US air or ocean forwarder with 5 to 50 users, you file AMS and ISF, and your daily pain is data moving between a CRM, an operations system and an accounting package. The single shipment record and the native ledger are the reasons to switch, not the module count. Verify three things in the demo: the exact scope of the Customs beta, the V2.0 timeline for road, door-to-door and spot-rate procurement, and a 10-seat annual quote in writing.

2. Shipthis

Best for

Forwarders, logistics companies and NVOCCs that want a published per-seat price and a genuine 30 day trial before committing.

Shipthis earns its place at number two on transparency alone. The specifics:

• Published pricing. $89 per user per month, a listed inventory of what the Standard tier includes, and a 30 day trial with no card, all of which is rare in this category, where most vendors will not give you a number until you have sat through a discovery call.

• A genuinely broad base bundle. Shipment & Freight, CRM, Tariff & Rate, Quotation, a Freight Accounting Module and WMS all sit in the base tier. A forwarder comparing that against a $45 or $75 seat elsewhere should compare bundles, not just headline rates, because the cheaper seats do not all include the same modules.

• The add-ons are metered. Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB submission are billed "on a transactional basis," and the vendor frames it well: "you only pay for the add-ons you consume."

• The forecast is where it gets harder. For a low-volume forwarder that is genuinely cheaper. For a growing one it is a cost that scales with the business, which is exactly the cost you most want to model before signing. No public per-transaction rates are available, so the modelling has to happen in the sales conversation.

• US customs is the clearest gap for an American buyer. ACE, AMS and ISF are named nowhere on the Shipthis site, and CFO reviewer Azfar Q. states the product "Cannot automate custom clearance tasks."

• A warehouse contradiction to resolve. The same reviewer notes it "Doesn't have Warehouse & Inventory management," which sits oddly against WMS appearing in the Standard tier list and is worth resolving directly with the vendor.

• The accounting story needs the same resolution. Shipthis markets "GAAP-compliant accounting fully connected to every job, invoice, and cost accrual in real time" alongside "native integrations with QuickBooks, Xero, Sage," while Operations Supervisor Jumer N. adds that "Accounting reports, tables, data connections can be improved." Decide before you buy whether Shipthis is your ledger or a feed into one.

Pros

• Published per-seat price of $89 per user per month, rare in this category

• 30 day free trial with no card required

• Broad Standard bundle covering operations, CRM, rates, quoting, accounting and WMS

• Ease of use 4.8, value for money 4.8, support 4.7 on Capterra

• 4.8 / 5 overall on Capterra

• Explicitly serves NVOCCs, which several alternatives here do not

Cons

• ACE, AMS and ISF are named nowhere on the site, a real gap for US filing

• Reviewer Azfar Q.: "Doesn't have Warehouse & Inventory management. Cannot automate custom clearance tasks"

• Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB submission are billed per transaction, so the annual cost is not knowable from the pricing page

• Reviewer Jumer N.: "Accounting reports, tables, data connections can be improved"

• Reviewer Lauren N., COO: "It would be helpful to have a structured onboarding process for new clients/users"

• Reviewer Claire A.: "The sudden glitches like appearance of 'system errors' that occurs randomly"

• Reviewer Amit R.: "Customer portal can and should be more intuitive"

• 13 Capterra reviews and 1 G2 review is a thin evidence base

• Third-party directories list "$89 flat rate," which contradicts the vendor's own per-user page

Shipthis review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

Shipthis is a freight forwarding platform serving forwarders, logistics companies and NVOCCs, notable for publishing a per-seat price and offering a 30 day trial without a card.

Tool Features

The Standard tier includes Shipment & Freight, CRM, Tariff & Rate, Quotation, the Freight Accounting Module and WMS. Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB submission are add-ons billed per transaction. The vendor markets GAAP-compliant accounting connected to every job, invoice and cost accrual in real time, and also markets native integrations with QuickBooks, Xero and Sage.

What It Costs

$89 per user per month on Standard. Enterprise is a custom quote. Add-ons are billed on a transactional basis, with the vendor stating "you only pay for the add-ons you consume." Note that Capterra, GetApp and Software Advice list the price as "$89 flat rate," which conflicts with the vendor's own per-user pricing page.

Best fit for

Forwarders and NVOCCs that want to see a price before a sales call, that want to trial the product for a month, and whose volumes are low enough that transactional add-ons stay modest.

Not built for

US forwarders who need ACE, AMS or ISF filing inside the platform, or teams that need customs clearance tasks automated. Reviewers also flag warehouse and inventory depth.

What users are saying

Shipthis holds 4.8 out of 5 on Capterra from 13 reviews, with sub-scores of 4.8 for ease of use, 4.8 for value for money and 4.7 for support. Its G2 profile shows 5.0 out of 5 from a single review, which is too small to weigh. The most substantive criticism comes from Azfar Q., a CFO: "Doesn't have Warehouse & Inventory management. Cannot automate custom clearance tasks."

Our Verdict

Shipthis remains a reasonable choice for a forwarder or NVOCC that values a published price, a real trial and a broad base bundle, particularly outside the US. Its weakness for an American buyer is specific rather than general: customs filing is not named in the product, and the transactional add-ons make the annual bill hard to forecast. Before renewing or switching, get per-transaction rates for Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB in writing, and confirm whether WMS is in your tier.

3. GoFreight

Best for

Forwarders that want a modern operations suite backed by a large and current G2 review base.

GoFreight carries one of the strongest current review profiles among the direct Shipthis competitors here. The specifics:

• A large and current pool. 4.8 out of 5 from 92 G2 reviews.

• An older second pool. Its Capterra profile shows 4.6 from 25 reviews, but those are dated 2019 to 2020 and should be read as history rather than as current sentiment. When two pools disagree, check the dates before averaging them.

• No public pricing. That is the norm in this category and still a disadvantage against Shipthis when you are trying to build a budget.

• Implementation quoted at 4 to 8 weeks. That figure comes from GoFreight rather than from an independent source, so treat it as a target to hold the vendor to rather than a benchmark.

• Accounting is the consistent theme in the criticism. Reviewer frank f. writes that GoFreight needs "more account function" because he does "not need another accounting software running," which is a forwarder asking for the ledger to be sufficient on its own.

• Month-end is where it lands. Reviewer edward l. is more specific: the "accounting function does not allow to revise and reconcile invoices with ease." Invoice revision and reconciliation are month-end work, so this is a recurring cost rather than an occasional annoyance.

• Warehouse depth is limited. Kevin C. reports the "warehouse function is very limited" with "no e-commerce supported feature."

• Data exchange is a migration risk. TONY C. reports it is "Difficult to import/export datasets from other firms," which cuts in both directions, coming in from Shipthis and going out later.

Pros

• 4.8 / 5 on G2 across 92 reviews, a large and current pool

• Vendor-quoted implementation of 4 to 8 weeks

• Strong sentiment on core forwarding operations

• 4.6 / 5 on Capterra, though from a 2019 to 2020 pool

Cons

• Pricing not publicly disclosed

• Reviewer frank f.: "need more account function...don't need another accounting software running"

• Reviewer edward l.: "accounting function does not allow to revise and reconcile invoices with ease"

• Reviewer Kevin C.: "warehouse function is very limited...no e-commerce supported feature"

• Reviewer TONY C.: "Difficult to import/export datasets from other firms"

• The 4 to 8 week implementation figure is the vendor's own and is not independently verified

• Capterra pool is five to six years old

GoFreight review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

GoFreight is a freight forwarding operations platform with the strongest current review base among the direct Shipthis competitors in this comparison.

Tool Features

Forwarding operations with accounting and warehouse functions included. Reviewers describe the accounting and warehouse modules as the weaker areas, and dataset import and export as difficult.

What It Costs

Not publicly disclosed. Ask for a per-seat figure, an implementation fee, and confirmation of whether anything is billed per shipment.

Best fit for

Forwarders that want a modern operations core and are willing to keep a separate accounting workflow, or to accept limits on invoice revision and reconciliation.

Not built for

Operations that need warehouse depth or e-commerce fulfilment, or teams that need frequent bulk data exchange with other firms.

What users are saying

GoFreight holds 4.8 out of 5 on G2 from 92 reviews and 4.6 out of 5 on Capterra from 25 reviews dated 2019 to 2020. The accounting theme is consistent across reviewers. As edward l. puts it, the "accounting function does not allow to revise and reconcile invoices with ease."

Our Verdict

GoFreight suits forwarders whose priority is a well-rated operations core and who can live with accounting that reviewers say falls short of replacing a separate package. It carries one of the strongest current review profiles among direct Shipthis competitors here, which counts for something real. Before you commit, run a month-end test: revise and reconcile a real invoice, and import and export a full dataset. Then get pricing and implementation scope in writing, since neither is public.

4. Magaya

Best for

Operations that combine forwarding, customs brokerage and warehousing in one company and want all three in one system.

Magaya's case rests on functional breadth and on the size of its evidence base. The specifics:

• The second largest review pool here. 281 G2 reviews, and 4.4 out of 5 from that many buyers is a more durable signal than a higher score from a dozen.

• Breadth is the distinguishing strength. Forwarding, customs, warehouse and accounting in a single system, which is the exact combination the Shipthis reviewer base says is missing from Shipthis.

• Best when you run all three lines. For a company that genuinely runs all three lines of business, that breadth is hard to replicate by stitching products together. If you are a forwarder who also brokers and also stores, Magaya is the most natural fit in this set.

• Implementation cost is the first criticism. George G. reports that "implementation is a very lengthy process with multiple charges and fees," which is a warning about the total first-year number rather than the licence. Ask for implementation scoped and priced as a fixed figure, and ask what triggers an additional fee.

• The accounting bridge is the second. Jakub L. describes the QuickBooks integration as producing "constant sync failures, missing transactions, duplicate records, accounting discrepancies." That is the bridged-ledger problem in its clearest form, and it is the strongest argument in this whole comparison for deciding upfront which system is your single book of record.

• Both criticisms are about cost and data, not capability. One thing reviewers do not complain about is the interface. Magaya's users praise it, so do not let its age in the market lead you to assume otherwise.

Pros

• Forwarding, customs, warehouse and accounting in one system, the broadest functional footprint among the mid-market options here

• 281 G2 reviews, the largest pool of any full forwarding suite in this comparison

• G2 ease of setup 8.2 / 10, a strong score

• Interface is well regarded by reviewers

Cons

• Pricing not publicly disclosed

• Reviewer George G.: "implementation is a very lengthy process with multiple charges and fees"

• Reviewer Jakub L. on the QuickBooks connection: "constant sync failures, missing transactions, duplicate records, accounting discrepancies"

• 4.4 / 5 is the second lowest overall rating in this comparison

• AMS and ISF specifics are not documented publicly

Magaya review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

Magaya is a logistics platform combining forwarding, customs, warehouse and accounting, aimed at companies that run more than one of those lines of business.

Tool Features

Freight forwarding operations, customs, warehouse management and accounting in one system, with a QuickBooks connection available. The QuickBooks path is the one reviewers criticize.

What It Costs

Not publicly disclosed. Reviewers specifically flag implementation charges and fees, so scope and price implementation separately from the licence.

Best fit for

Companies that forward, broker and warehouse under one roof and want a single system of record across all three.

Not built for

Buyers who need a fast, low-cost start. The implementation is described by reviewers as lengthy with multiple charges.

What users are saying

Magaya holds 4.4 out of 5 on G2 from 281 reviews and 4.4 out of 5 on Capterra from 51 reviews, with G2 ease of setup at 8.2 out of 10. The sharpest criticism concerns the accounting bridge, where Jakub L. reports "constant sync failures, missing transactions, duplicate records, accounting discrepancies."

Our Verdict

Magaya is the right answer when forwarding, customs brokerage and warehousing all sit inside the same company, and the 281-review base makes its 4.4 one of the more trustworthy numbers here. The things to verify are financial rather than functional. Get implementation scoped as a fixed fee with the triggers for extras written down, and decide explicitly whether Magaya or your accounting package is the book of record before anyone connects QuickBooks.

5. Logistaas

Best for

Small and midsize forwarders that want a flat per-seat cost with no transaction or per-shipment fees at all.

Logistaas answers the metered-billing problem more directly than anything else in this comparison. The specifics:

• Published tiers. $45, $65 and $85 per user per month, with a one-time implementation fee.

• No metered fees at all. The vendor states explicitly that there are no transaction or per-shipment fees, so a 10-seat annual figure is arithmetic rather than a forecast, which is exactly what a Shipthis buyer worried about transactional add-ons is looking for.

• A real suite, not a light tool. It is a genuine small and mid-market forwarding suite with native accounting. That combination, a real ledger plus a price you can multiply out, is uncommon.

• US filing is the first named limit. Kim D., a commercial manager, points at US filing: there are "certain things that a US software can do like file AES information." For a US forwarder, that is the same category of gap that pushes people away from Shipthis in the first place, so test it carefully rather than assuming parity.

• No warehouse module. Jefferson I., a head of finance, notes "it doesn't include a warehouse management system." If you store cargo, that is a second system.

• A thin evidence base. 33 Capterra reviews, with no G2 pool in our source set to cross-check against. Weight it accordingly.

Pros

• Published tiers at $45, $65 and $85 per user per month, the second lowest entry price here

• Explicitly no transaction or per-shipment fees, so the annual cost is predictable

• Native accounting rather than an integration-only approach

• A genuine small and midsize forwarding suite, not a point tool

• 4.5 / 5 on Capterra

Cons

• Reviewer Kim D.: "certain things that a US software can do like file AES information," so US filing depth needs testing

• Reviewer Jefferson I.: "it doesn't include a warehouse management system"

• One-time implementation fee is not publicly quantified

• 33 Capterra reviews is a small pool, with no G2 pool in our source set

Logistaas review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

Logistaas is a small and midsize forwarding suite with native accounting and a per-seat price that carries no transaction or per-shipment fees.

Tool Features

Forwarding operations with native accounting. No warehouse management system, per a reviewer in a finance leadership role. US-specific filings such as AES are named as a gap by a commercial manager reviewer.

What It Costs

$45, $65 and $85 per user per month by tier, plus a one-time implementation fee. The vendor states there are no transaction or per-shipment fees.

Best fit for

Small and midsize forwarders outside the US, or US forwarders whose customs filing is handled by a broker, who want a fully predictable annual software cost.

Not built for

Forwarders that store cargo and need a warehouse module, or US operations that need AES and similar filings inside the platform.

What users are saying

Logistaas holds 4.5 out of 5 on Capterra from 33 reviews. The two most useful criticisms are both scope rather than quality. Kim D., a commercial manager, cites "certain things that a US software can do like file AES information."

Our Verdict

Logistaas is the cleanest pricing story in this comparison, and for a forwarder burned by metered add-ons that alone may decide it. It suits small and midsize operations that want native accounting and a number they can multiply by headcount. US forwarders should treat the AES comment as a hard test in the demo, and anyone storing cargo should budget for a separate warehouse system. Also ask for the one-time implementation fee as a figure, since it is not published.

6. Logitude World

Best for

Forwarding teams that weight vendor responsiveness heavily and want a mid-priced per-seat option.

Logitude World publishes its pricing, which puts it in the transparent minority. The specifics:

• Published tiers. Smart at $75 per user per month, Professional at $99, and Enterprise through sales for 30 or more users. Against Shipthis at $89, it brackets the benchmark on both sides.

• Support is the standout strength. A 4.8 support sub-score is the highest-scoring dimension in its profile, and for a small forwarding team without internal IT, a vendor that answers quickly is worth more than a feature checkbox. That is the reason to shortlist it.

• Automation credits are metered. Each tier includes credits, 1,000 for Smart, 2,000 for Professional and 5,000 for Enterprise, per user, and extra credits cost $1 per 1,000.

• Model the credit burn anyway. That is a modest and clearly published rate, which is better than an undisclosed one, but it means a high-automation workflow adds a variable line to the bill. Model your credit consumption during the evaluation.

• Accounting reporting is the first recurring criticism. Reviewers report that "Multiple Accounting reports are missing," which puts Logitude in the same bucket as most of this category on financial reporting depth.

• Integration cost is the second. Reviewers note "API are bit expensive if you want to integrate with other software internally," which matters if your plan involves connecting a warehouse system, a customer portal or a data warehouse.

Pros

• Published tiers at $75 and $99 per user per month, with Enterprise pricing for 30+ users

• Support sub-score of 4.8 is its strongest dimension

• 4.6 / 5 on G2 from 94 reviews, a solid and reasonably sized pool

• Automation credit rates are published at $1 per 1,000, so overage is at least knowable

Cons

• Reviewers: "Multiple Accounting reports are missing"

• Reviewers: "API are bit expensive if you want to integrate with other software internally"

• Automation credits are metered, so the annual cost varies with usage

• US customs filing is not documented

• Implementation timeline is not documented

Logitude World review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

Logitude World is a freight forwarding platform with published per-seat tiers, metered automation credits and a support reputation that outranks the rest of its profile.

Tool Features

Forwarding operations with accounting, plus automation credits included by tier. Integration is available via API, which reviewers describe as expensive for internal connections.

What It Costs

Smart at $75 per user per month, Professional at $99 per user per month, Enterprise through sales for 30 or more users. Automation credits of 1,000, 2,000 and 5,000 per user by tier, with extra credits at $1 per 1,000.

Best fit for

Forwarding teams without internal IT that will lean on vendor support, and that want a published mid-market seat price.

Not built for

Finance teams that need deep accounting reporting out of the box, or operations planning heavy internal API integration on a tight budget.

What users are saying

Logitude World holds 4.6 out of 5 on G2 from 94 reviews and 4.5 out of 5 on Capterra from 40 reviews, with support at 4.8 as the standout sub-score. The recurring criticism is reporting depth, summarized by reviewers as "Multiple Accounting reports are missing."

Our Verdict

Logitude World is a sensible pick for a small forwarding team that will rely on the vendor rather than internal IT, and its published tiers make it easy to compare against Shipthis at $89. The two things to test are the ones reviewers name. Ask finance to list the accounting reports they need and confirm each exists, and get an API pricing sheet before assuming any integration is affordable. Also estimate your automation credit burn across a realistic month.

7. Fresa XPress

Best for

Cost-sensitive forwarders who need the lowest documented per-seat entry price in this comparison.

Fresa XPress pairs the lowest documented entry price here with an unusually large review base. The specifics:

• $40 per user per month plus a one-time setup fee. That is the lowest documented entry price here, roughly 45% of the Shipthis Standard seat.

• A large, highly rated pool. The largest Capterra pool of any direct competitor in this comparison at 164 reviews, rated 4.8, with a further 5.0 from 44 SourceForge reviews. Price and sentiment do not usually run in that direction together.

• Read the geography of the review base. Fresa XPress's reviewers are concentrated in India and the Gulf. That is not a quality signal in either direction, but it does mean the pool tells you less about US-specific workflows, and US customs filing is not documented publicly.

• US buyers should test independently. Treat the reviews as evidence of general product quality and test the US-specific requirements yourself.

• Posted transactions are hard to edit. Sameer S., a finance manager, reports "Limited flexibility for editing posted transactions," which is a month-end correction workflow issue.

• Reports slow down at volume. Siva S., a manager, notes the "System may become slow when handling large volumes of data, especially in reports," which is a scale consideration for higher-volume operations.

Pros

• $40 per user per month, the lowest documented entry price in this comparison

• 4.8 / 5 on Capterra from 164 reviews, the largest direct-competitor Capterra pool here

• 5.0 / 5 on SourceForge from 44 reviews

• Accounting included

Cons

• Reviewer Sameer S.: "Limited flexibility for editing posted transactions"

• Reviewer Siva S.: "System may become slow when handling large volumes of data, especially in reports"

• One-time setup fee is not publicly quantified

• US customs filing is not documented

• Review base is concentrated in India and the Gulf, so it says little about US workflows

Fresa XPress review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

Fresa XPress is a low-cost freight forwarding platform with a large, highly rated review base concentrated in India and the Gulf.

Tool Features

Forwarding operations with accounting. Reviewers name posted-transaction editing and report performance at high data volumes as the limits.

What It Costs

$40 per user per month plus a one-time setup fee. The setup fee is not publicly quantified.

Best fit for

Cost-sensitive forwarders that need a full operations system at the lowest documented per-seat price and can validate US-specific requirements themselves.

Not built for

High-volume operations that run heavy reporting, or finance teams that frequently need to edit posted transactions.

What users are saying

Fresa XPress holds 4.8 out of 5 on Capterra from 164 reviews and 5.0 out of 5 on SourceForge from 44 reviews. The criticisms are narrow and operational. Sameer S., a finance manager, cites "Limited flexibility for editing posted transactions."

Our Verdict

Fresa XPress deserves a place on any shortlist built around budget, because $40 per seat with 164 Capterra reviews at 4.8 is an unusual combination. It fits forwarders who need a complete operations system without a per-seat argument internally. US buyers should run their own customs and compliance test rather than relying on a review base drawn mostly from other regions, ask for the setup fee as a figure, and load-test a large report before signing.

8. CargoWise

Best for

Large multinational forwarders with the internal or partner capacity to resource a demanding implementation.

CargoWise changed its commercial model on 1 December 2025, and any pricing guidance written before that date is now wrong. The specifics:

• A new commercial model. WiseTech launched CargoWise Value Packs, stating that "there are no longer any CargoWise Cloud standard hosting costs or seat fees."

• Charging is now per job. Charges are "an all-in-one transaction fee per logistics job, such as a shipment, stand-alone customs declaration, land transport movement or warehouse order line."

• That changes what drives your bill. Under a per-job model your cost tracks volume rather than headcount, which can favour a firm with many light users and penalize one with high shipment counts per employee. No public dollar figures accompany the announcement, so the comparison against $89 per seat has to be modelled from your own job counts in a sales conversation.

• The review picture needs careful reading. CargoWise holds 4.3 out of 5 on G2 from 35 reviews and 2.9 out of 5 on Capterra from 32, and the Capterra pool contains no reviews after May 2022. Treat the low Capterra number as a snapshot of that era rather than a verdict on the current product.

• The sub-scores are the most useful diagnostic. Software Advice records ease of use 2.7, value 2.6, support 1.9 and functionality 3.4. Functionality is the highest of the four. In other words, capability is not what reviewers complain about. Usability, value and support are. That is the profile of a deep system that is demanding to run.

• Implementation is the practical constraint. CargoWise scores 6.4 out of 10 on G2 ease of setup, the lowest figure in this comparison, and delivery runs through a certified Service Partner model. That means a third party, a scope and a separate commercial agreement, which is workable for a large forwarder with a project team and difficult for a ten-person office.

Pros

• Functionality is the highest Software Advice sub-score at 3.4, so depth of capability is not the complaint

• Value Packs remove seat fees and standard hosting costs entirely, which can suit firms with many occasional users

• Covers shipments, stand-alone customs declarations, land transport movements and warehouse order lines

• Certified Service Partner network for implementation

Cons

• No public dollar figures under the new per-job transaction model, so the annual cost cannot be modelled without the vendor

• Cost now scales with job volume rather than headcount, which penalizes high-volume, lean-headcount operations

• G2 ease of setup 6.4 / 10, the lowest in this comparison

• Software Advice sub-scores: ease of use 2.7, value 2.6, support 1.9

• Capterra 2.9 / 5 from 32 reviews, a pool with nothing after May 2022

• Implementation runs through third-party partners, adding a second commercial relationship

CargoWise review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

CargoWise is the enterprise end of this category, aimed at large multinational forwarders, and it moved to a per-job transaction pricing model on 1 December 2025.

Tool Features

Coverage spans shipments, stand-alone customs declarations, land transport movements and warehouse order lines, per the Value Packs announcement. Reviewer sub-scores put functionality above ease of use, value and support.

What It Costs

Under CargoWise Value Packs, launched 1 December 2025, "there are no longer any CargoWise Cloud standard hosting costs or seat fees." Charges are "an all-in-one transaction fee per logistics job, such as a shipment, stand-alone customs declaration, land transport movement or warehouse order line." No public dollar figures are available.

Best fit for

Large multinational forwarders with a dedicated project team or an established Service Partner relationship, that need maximum functional depth across many countries and modes.

Not built for

Small and midsize forwarders without implementation resources. A ten-person office will want a different fit.

What users are saying

CargoWise holds 4.3 out of 5 on G2 from 35 reviews and 2.9 out of 5 on Capterra from 32 reviews, with that Capterra pool ending in May 2022. Software Advice sub-scores are ease of use 2.7, value 2.6, support 1.9 and functionality 3.4, which points at experience rather than capability as the problem.

Our Verdict

CargoWise fits large multinational forwarders that need depth across many countries and modes and can staff the implementation, either internally or through a certified Service Partner. Small and midsize forwarders will want a different fit. Because pricing moved to a per-job transaction fee on 1 December 2025 with no published figures, the essential homework is modelling a full year against your actual job volumes, including customs declarations and warehouse order lines, before comparing it to any per-seat quote.

9. GoComet

Best for

Adding visibility, rate benchmarking and freight audit next to an operating system you intend to keep.

GoComet holds the best numbers in this comparison and does the narrowest job. The specifics:

• The strongest review profile here. 4.9 out of 5 from 242 G2 reviews, the strongest combination of score and sample size in this comparison, and that number is earned.

• Not a Shipthis replacement. GoComet is a point tool for visibility, rate benchmarking and freight audit. There is no shipment file, no job costing, no forwarder accounting and no customs filing.

• Add it, do not swap it. If you replace Shipthis with GoComet you will lose the system your operators work in every day. If you add GoComet alongside a forwarding suite, you gain the thing most suites do least well.

• Why it sits at number nine. A rating is only meaningful relative to what the product is trying to do, and GoComet is being rated on a narrower job.

• Road coverage trails ocean. Rushabh T. reports that "GoComet's coverage for ocean freight is more comprehensive than its coverage for road freight," so road-heavy operations should test coverage on their own lanes.

• PDF-only bills of lading. Shwetha S. notes "The restriction to only PDF format for BLs is somewhat limiting," which is a document-handling constraint rather than a data one.

• No public pricing. Pricing is not publicly disclosed.

Pros

• 4.9 / 5 on G2 from 242 reviews, the strongest score and sample size combination in this comparison

• 4.8 / 5 on Capterra from 51 reviews

• Purpose-built for visibility, rate benchmarking and freight audit, the areas most forwarding suites treat as secondary

• Strong ocean freight coverage per reviewers

Cons

• Not a forwarding suite: no shipment file, no job costing, no forwarder accounting, no customs filing

• Cannot replace Shipthis on its own, only supplement it

• Reviewer Rushabh T.: ocean coverage "is more comprehensive than its coverage for road freight"

• Reviewer Shwetha S.: "The restriction to only PDF format for BLs is somewhat limiting"

• Pricing not publicly disclosed

GoComet review: snapshot, features, cost and user sentiment

Snapshot

GoComet is a visibility, rate-benchmarking and freight-audit platform. It is a point tool that complements a forwarding suite rather than replacing one.

Tool Features

Shipment visibility, rate benchmarking and freight audit. It does not provide a shipment file, job costing, forwarder accounting or customs filing. Bills of lading are handled in PDF format only, per a reviewer.

What It Costs

Not publicly disclosed.

Best fit for

Forwarders and shippers that already have an operations system and want stronger tracking, rate benchmarking and invoice audit alongside it, particularly on ocean lanes.

Not built for

Anyone looking to replace a full forwarding suite. Road-heavy operations should also verify lane coverage first.

What users are saying

GoComet holds 4.9 out of 5 on G2 from 242 reviews and 4.8 out of 5 on Capterra from 51 reviews, among the highest scores in this comparison. Reviewers are clear about the edges of the product. Rushabh T. notes that "GoComet's coverage for ocean freight is more comprehensive than its coverage for road freight."

Our Verdict

GoComet is excellent at a narrower job than the rest of this list, and its 4.9 from 242 reviews reflects that focus rather than contradicting the ranking. Add it to a forwarding suite when tracking, rate benchmarking or freight audit is the gap. Do not treat it as a Shipthis replacement, because there is no shipment file or ledger underneath it. If your lanes are road-heavy, test coverage on your own routes before committing.

10. Descartes

Best for

Layering real-time visibility onto a system you are keeping.

Descartes MacroPoint is a real-time visibility product rather than a forwarding suite. The specifics:

• The largest evidence base here. The 893 G2 reviews behind its 4.7 rating make it the largest evidence base in this comparison by a wide margin.

• A stack addition, not a replacement. Like GoComet, it solves one problem rather than running your business, so it belongs in a stack alongside a forwarding system rather than in place of one.

• No public pricing. Pricing is not publicly disclosed, and no per-seat or per-shipment figures are available.

Descartes MacroPoint suits teams that have already settled their operations and accounting platform and need better real-time tracking on top of it. Forwarders shopping for a Shipthis replacement will want a different fit, because there is no shipment file, job costing or ledger here to replace what Shipthis does.

What a Shipthis Alternative Actually Needs to Fix

Forwarders do not usually replace software because it is bad. They replace it because a specific, repeating cost has become visible. Four of those costs show up again and again in the review evidence for this category.

The customs gap. ACE, AMS and ISF appear nowhere on the Shipthis site, and a Shipthis CFO reviewer, Azfar Q., puts it plainly: the product "Cannot automate custom clearance tasks." For a US forwarder that is not a feature preference, it is a workflow that has to live somewhere. Either the platform files, or a broker does it in a separate system and someone re-keys the data.

The ledger question. Shipthis markets "GAAP-compliant accounting fully connected to every job, invoice, and cost accrual in real time" and, on the same site, "native integrations with QuickBooks, Xero, Sage." Both can be true, but only one can be your book of record. Forwarders who never resolve that question end up reconciling two systems forever. The risk is not theoretical: a Magaya reviewer, Jakub L., describes "constant sync failures, missing transactions, duplicate records, accounting discrepancies" in the QuickBooks connection.

The metered bill. Shipthis bills Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB submission "on a transactional basis," with the reassurance that "you only pay for the add-ons you consume." That is a fair model and a genuinely flexible one. It is also a number you cannot forecast from a pricing page, because it moves with your shipment count. Logitude World meters automation credits the same way. CargoWise now meters everything, having replaced seat fees entirely with a per-job transaction fee.

Reporting and data portability. Two of the most common criticisms across this category are that accounting reports do not go deep enough and that getting data in and out is harder than expected. Shipthis reviewer Jumer N. says "Accounting reports, tables, data connections can be improved." GoFreight reviewer TONY C. reports it is "Difficult to import/export datasets from other firms." Both are migration problems as much as daily-use problems.

A replacement worth switching for has to close at least two of those four gaps. Closing one rarely justifies the disruption.

How to Choose a Shipthis Alternative

The category rewards specific testing over general demos. These eight steps map directly to the failure modes documented above.

1. Price a 10-seat year including per-transaction add-ons. Take the seat price, multiply by 10, multiply by 12, then add implementation and every metered item. For Shipthis that means asking for per-transaction rates on Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB submission. For Logitude World it means estimating automation credit burn beyond the included 1,000, 2,000 or 5,000 per user. For CargoWise it means modelling per-job transaction fees against your actual shipment, customs declaration, land transport and warehouse order volumes. Logistaas is the only vendor here that states there are no transaction or per-shipment fees at all.

2. File a test AMS and ISF end to end. Do not accept "we support customs." Ask the vendor to file a real test AMS and a real test ISF during the evaluation, and watch who does the data entry. Shipthis names ACE, AMS and ISF nowhere on its site. CargoEZ covers AMS and ISF in a beta module, with direct ACE portal connectivity scheduled for V2.0. Everyone else in this set is undocumented on the specifics.

3. Decide your book of record before anyone connects an accounting package. If the freight system is your ledger, do not also sync to QuickBooks. If QuickBooks is your ledger, accept that the freight system is a feed. The failure mode is documented: a Magaya reviewer reports "constant sync failures, missing transactions, duplicate records, accounting discrepancies" on exactly this path.

4. Run a real month-end in the trial. Post a batch of invoices, revise one, reconcile it, and pull the reports finance actually uses. This is where GoFreight's "cannot revise and reconcile invoices with ease," Logitude's "Multiple Accounting reports are missing" and Fresa XPress's "Limited flexibility for editing posted transactions" would each surface in under an hour.

5. Import your data and then export it again. Bring in a real customer list, a rate table and a batch of historical shipments, then export all three. GoFreight reviewers specifically cite difficulty importing and exporting datasets from other firms. An export you cannot run is a lock-in you did not price.

6. Get implementation scoped, priced and dated in writing. Ask what is included, what triggers an additional fee, and what the go-live date is. A Magaya reviewer describes implementation as "a very lengthy process with multiple charges and fees." GoFreight's 4 to 8 week claim is the vendor's own figure, so put it in the contract if it matters. CargoEZ averages under one month on G2. CargoWise scores 6.4 out of 10 on G2 ease of setup and delivers through certified Service Partners, which means a second contract.

7. Check the dates on every review pool you are relying on. GoFreight's Capterra reviews are from 2019 to 2020. CargoWise's Capterra pool has nothing after May 2022. Both are useful history and neither describes the 2026 product.

8. Put one real customer through the portal. Shipthis reviewer Amit R. says the "Customer portal can and should be more intuitive." Customer portals are usually demoed by the vendor and used by your customer, which is why they get evaluated badly. Have an actual customer log in and find a document.

Shipthis Migration Mistakes That Cost Money

Budgeting the seat price and forgetting the meter. The single most expensive mistake in this category. Shipthis bills Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB submission per transaction. Logitude World meters automation credits at $1 per 1,000 beyond the tier allowance. CargoWise dropped seat fees entirely in favour of a per-job transaction fee on 1 December 2025. In all three cases the pricing page number is a floor, not a total.

Trusting a directory listing over the vendor's own page. Capterra, GetApp and Software Advice list Shipthis as "$89 flat rate." The vendor's pricing page says $89 per user per month. At ten seats that is a tenfold difference in your model. Always reconcile the two before presenting a budget internally.

Assuming the new platform files US customs. ACE, AMS and ISF appear nowhere on the Shipthis site, and a Logistaas reviewer names AES as something "a US software can do" that the product does not. If nobody tests a filing during the evaluation, you discover the gap after go-live, when the workaround becomes a permanent manual process.

Treating "integrates with QuickBooks" as equivalent to a ledger. Shipthis markets both a GAAP-compliant accounting module and native QuickBooks, Xero and Sage integrations. Those are two different architectures. Picking neither, and running both, is how you end up reconciling forever.

Migrating mid-quarter with open jobs. Half-billed jobs that span two systems produce exactly the discrepancies reviewers describe. Cut over at a period boundary, close what you can, and carry the rest deliberately rather than by accident.

Skipping a written onboarding plan. A Shipthis COO reviewer, Lauren N., asks for "a structured onboarding process for new clients/users." If the vendor does not provide one, write it yourself and get the vendor to sign off on the milestones.

Not testing export before you need it. You will eventually leave, or at minimum need your data in a warehouse. GoFreight reviewer TONY C. flags dataset import and export as difficult. Test the export on day one of the trial, not in year three.

Buying a visibility tool to solve an operations problem. GoComet and Descartes MacroPoint are both excellent and neither has a shipment file, job costing or a ledger. They sit next to your operating system. They do not become one.

Reading a stale review pool as current sentiment. GoFreight's 4.6 on Capterra comes from 2019 to 2020 reviews. CargoWise's 2.9 on Capterra comes from a pool with nothing after May 2022. Neither number should drive a 2026 decision on its own.

Which Shipthis Alternative Fits Your Operation?

You are a US air or ocean forwarder with 5 to 50 users who files AMS and ISF: start with CargoEZ. One shipment record across CRM, rates, operations, ledger and customs is the reason, and the under-one-month G2 implementation average is the practical argument.

You want a published price and a real trial before committing: Shipthis at $89 per user per month with 30 days free and no card, or Logistaas from $45 per user per month if a fully fee-free model matters more than the trial.

You need the cheapest complete operations system: Fresa XPress at $40 per user per month plus setup, with 164 Capterra reviews at 4.8 behind it.

You need guaranteed cost predictability with no metering anywhere: Logistaas, the only platform here that explicitly states no transaction or per-shipment fees.

You forward, broker and warehouse under one roof: Magaya, the broadest functional footprint in the mid-market, with 281 G2 reviews behind its 4.4.

You want the strongest current review base among direct competitors: GoFreight at 4.8 from 92 G2 reviews, accepting the documented accounting limits.

Your team has no internal IT and will lean on the vendor: Logitude World, whose 4.8 support sub-score is its strongest dimension, from $75 per user per month.

You are a large multinational with a project team: CargoWise, priced per logistics job since 1 December 2025, with the depth to match and the lowest ease-of-setup score here.

You already have an operations system and need visibility: GoComet for visibility, rate benchmarking and freight audit, or Descartes MacroPoint for real-time tracking specifically.

You are an NVOCC: Shipthis explicitly serves NVOCCs. CargoEZ does not, and NVOCCs will want a different fit.

The Bottom Line on Shipthis Alternatives

Shipthis is a better product than a comparison article can easily convey, because its two most distinctive traits, a published price and a 30 day trial, are commercial rather than functional. In a category where most vendors will not quote until you have taken a call, that transparency is worth real money to a small forwarder.

The reasons forwarders leave are narrow and specific. ACE, AMS and ISF are named nowhere in the product, and a CFO reviewer states customs clearance tasks cannot be automated. The add-ons for Track and Trace, Trade Messaging and eAWB are billed per transaction, so the annual bill is not knowable from the pricing page. And the accounting story runs in two directions at once, a GAAP-compliant module and native QuickBooks, Xero and Sage integrations, which leaves the book-of-record question for the buyer to settle.

For a US air or ocean forwarder, those three gaps point in one direction, which is a platform where customs, the ledger and operations write to the same shipment record. That is the case for CargoEZ, and it is also the reason for the disclosure at the top of this article rather than at the bottom.

For everyone else, the honest answer is that the right alternative depends on which gate you failed. Logistaas if the meter is the problem. Fresa XPress if the seat price is. Magaya if the missing warehouse is. GoFreight if you want a large, current G2 review base behind the decision. CargoWise if you are large enough to absorb the implementation. GoComet or Descartes if what you actually needed was visibility, not a new operating system.

Whichever way you go, do the two tests that catch the most expensive mistakes: price a 10-seat year with every metered item included, and file a test AMS and ISF end to end before you sign.

Sources

Source URLs recorded for this comparison:

• Shipthis reviews, Capterra: https://www.capterra.com/p/176591/Shipthis/reviews/

• Shipthis pricing, vendor site: shipthis.co/pricing

• GoFreight reviews, G2: https://www.g2.com/products/gofreight/reviews

• Magaya Supply Chain reviews, G2: https://www.g2.com/products/magaya-supply-chain/reviews

• CargoWise One reviews, Capterra: https://www.capterra.com/p/22135/CargoWise-One/reviews/

Additional sources cited in this article for which no URL is recorded in our source set. Each is named so it can be verified independently:

• Shipthis reviews, G2 (5.0 out of 5, 1 review)

• CargoEZ reviews, G2 (4.8 out of 5, 40 reviews, including the implementation-time average)

• GoFreight reviews, Capterra (4.6 out of 5, 25 reviews, dated 2019 to 2020)

• Magaya reviews, Capterra (4.4 out of 5, 51 reviews)

• CargoWise reviews, G2 (4.3 out of 5, 35 reviews, plus the 6.4 out of 10 ease of setup score)

• CargoWise sub-scores, Software Advice (ease of use 2.7, value 2.6, support 1.9, functionality 3.4)

• WiseTech Global announcement of CargoWise Value Packs, 1 December 2025

• Logitude World reviews, G2 (4.6 out of 5, 94 reviews) and Capterra (4.5 out of 5, 40 reviews)

• Logitude World pricing, vendor site (Smart, Professional and Enterprise tiers, automation credits)

• GoComet reviews, G2 (4.9 out of 5, 242 reviews) and Capterra (4.8 out of 5, 51 reviews)

• Logistaas reviews, Capterra (4.5 out of 5, 33 reviews)

• Logistaas pricing, vendor site (three per-user tiers, one-time implementation fee, no transaction fees)

• Fresa XPress reviews, Capterra (4.8 out of 5, 164 reviews) and SourceForge (5.0 out of 5, 44 reviews)

• Fresa XPress pricing, vendor site ($40 per user per month plus one-time setup fee)

• Descartes MacroPoint reviews, G2 (4.7 out of 5, 893 reviews) and Capterra (4.6 out of 5, 12 reviews)

• CargoEZ product documentation for module scope, security certifications and ICP definition

Ratings and review counts were current as of publication. Review pools change, and two of the pools cited here, GoFreight on Capterra and CargoWise on Capterra, have not received new reviews for several years, as noted inline.